Court Fees Act, 1870 – MCQ (Set 1)
- What is the main purpose of the Court Fees Act, 1870?
a) To regulate the functioning of courts
b) To impose a fee on litigants for using court services
c) To specify the jurisdiction of courts
d) To establish rules for evidence
[read more] Answer
b) To impose a fee on litigants for using court services
Explanation – The Court Fees Act, 1870, primarily aims to regulate the collection of fees for documents filed in courts, ensuring revenue for the government. [/read]
- Which section of the Court Fees Act provides for exemptions from payment of court fees?
a) Section 19
b) Section 20
c) Section 21
d) Section 22
[read more] Answer
a) Section 19
Explanation – Section 19 of the Court Fees Act exempts certain categories of persons, such as indigent individuals, from paying court fees under specific conditions. [/read]
- Under which section does the Act provide for refund of court fees?
a) Section 14
b) Section 16
c) Section 18
d) Section 20
[read more] Answer
b) Section 16
Explanation – Section 16 outlines conditions where court fees can be refunded, such as when the case is settled outside the court before hearing. [/read]
- What does “ad valorem fee” mean under the Court Fees Act?
a) Fixed fee irrespective of the claim amount
b) Fee calculated based on the claim amount
c) Fee charged for appeals only
d) None of the above
[read more] Answer
b) Fee calculated based on the claim amount
Explanation – Ad valorem fees are calculated as a percentage of the claim amount or the value of the subject matter in dispute. [/read]
- What is the significance of Section 7 of the Court Fees Act, 1870?
a) Provides rules for stamp duty
b) Specifies fees for specific suits
c) Grants exemptions
d) Deals with refunds of fees
[read more] Answer
b) Specifies fees for specific suits
Explanation – Section 7 outlines the computation of fees payable for various suits, such as partition, specific performance, or property recovery. [/read]
- In which case did the Supreme Court hold that court fees cannot be waived arbitrarily?
a) State of Punjab v. Ajaib Singh
b) Central Coalfields Ltd. v. Jaiswal Coal Co.
c) State of Maharashtra v. Marwanjee Pitalwala
d) Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India
[read more] Answer
a) State of Punjab v. Ajaib Singh
Explanation – The Court emphasized that court fees are a statutory obligation and cannot be waived without proper statutory provisions. [/read]
- What is the maximum penalty for fraudulently undervaluing a suit under the Act?
a) Fine equal to court fees
b) Double the court fees
c) Imprisonment up to one year
d) Fine and imprisonment
[read more] Answer
b) Double the court fees
Explanation – The Act prescribes a penalty up to twice the amount of undervalued court fees to deter fraudulent practices. [/read]
- Under which provision can the government remit court fees?
a) Section 35
b) Section 30
c) Section 31
d) Section 32
[read more] Answer
a) Section 35
Explanation – Section 35 empowers the government to remit or reduce court fees in specific cases through a notification. [/read]
- Which Schedule of the Act provides a table of court fees?
a) Schedule I
b) Schedule II
c) Schedule III
d) Schedule IV
[read more] Answer
a) Schedule I
Explanation – Schedule I specifies the ad valorem and fixed fees applicable for different types of suits under the Act. [/read]
- Which case discussed the constitutional validity of the Court Fees Act, 1870?
a) Union of India v. J.K. Industries
b) In Re: Special Courts Bill, 1978
c) Secretary, Government of Madras v. Zenith Lamp
d) Prag Ice & Oil Mills v. Union of India
[read more] Answer
c) Secretary, Government of Madras v. Zenith Lamp
Explanation – The Court upheld the validity of the Act, emphasizing its necessity for revenue generation. [/read]
- Can an indigent person file a suit without paying court fees?
a) Yes, under Order XXXIII CPC
b) No, everyone must pay fees
c) Yes, if approved by the President
d) No, unless a special exemption is granted
[read more] Answer
a) Yes, under Order XXXIII CPC
Explanation – Indigent persons are allowed to file suits without fees under Order XXXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure. [/read]
- What is the role of Section 20 in the Court Fees Act?
a) Refund of fees in certain cases
b) Transfer of cases
c) Determination of jurisdictional value
d) Exemptions from fees
[read more] Answer
a) Refund of fees in certain cases
Explanation – Section 20 deals with refunds when appeals are withdrawn before hearing or judgment. [/read]
- Which High Court judgment clarified computation of ad valorem fees?
a) Delhi High Court in Vishnu Prasad v. State
b) Bombay High Court in Anand Rao v. Balaji Rao
c) Calcutta High Court in Basanti Devi v. Biswanath Ghosh
d) Allahabad High Court in Nand Kumar v. State
[read more] Answer
c) Calcutta High Court in Basanti Devi v. Biswanath Ghosh
Explanation – The case provided clarity on how to compute fees for property suits. [/read]
- Under which provision is the undervaluation of a suit addressed?
a) Section 6
b) Section 10
c) Section 8
d) Section 12
[read more] Answer
d) Section 12
Explanation – Section 12 addresses undervaluation issues and allows courts to direct proper valuation. [/read]
- Can the court reject a plaint for insufficient court fees?
a) No, courts cannot reject plaints
b) Yes, under Order VII Rule 11 CPC
c) No, but it can demand more fees
d) Yes, under Order VI Rule 10 CPC
[read more] Answer
b) Yes, under Order VII Rule 11 CPC
Explanation – Courts can reject a plaint if insufficient fees are paid under Order VII Rule 11. [/read]
- What does Section 13 of the Act deal with?
a) Exemption from court fees
b) Penalty for undervaluation
c) Refund of court fees on appeals
d) Valuation in the High Court
[read more] Answer
c) Refund of court fees on appeals
Explanation – Section 13 allows refund of court fees if the full claim is decreed in appeals. [/read]
- In which Supreme Court case was it held that “court fees are a source of revenue for the state”?
a) State of Karnataka v. Rameshwara Rice Mills
b) Bengal Immunity Co. v. State of Bihar
c) Salig Ram v. Union of India
d) State of Punjab v. Gurdev Singh
[read more] Answer
a) State of Karnataka v. Rameshwara Rice Mills
Explanation – The Court observed the revenue nature of court fees in this landmark judgment. [/read]
- Who decides disputes related to the adequacy of court fees paid?
a) Registrar of the Court
b) Civil Judge
c) Court where the suit is filed
d) High Court
[read more] Answer
c) Court where the suit is filed
Explanation – The presiding court determines whether the fees paid are adequate or not. [/read]
- Which section relates to the valuation of fees in suits concerning agricultural land?
a) Section 6
b) Section 7(3)
c) Section 8
d) Section 9
[read more] Answer
b) Section 7(3)
Explanation – Section 7(3) specifically deals with fees payable in suits involving agricultural land. [/read]
- What is the scope of Section 11 in the Court Fees Act?
a) Fee calculation for service suits
b) Stamp duty on affidavits
c) Fee exemption for paupers
d) Valuation disputes
Click[read more] Answer
d) Valuation disputes
Explanation – Section 11 addresses disputes arising due to incorrect valuation of suits and provides procedural guidance. [/read]