- Advertisement -

AUTHOR NAME

SPShahi

441 POSTS
4 COMMENTS
Author, SP Shahi is Advocate at the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, He holds LL.M. degree and qualification in the NET exam. He prefers to write on legal articles and current affairs.

भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम 2023 की धारा 1 क्या बदला, क्या बेहतर हुआ

भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम 2023 की धारा 1 बनाम 1872: क्या बदला, क्या बेहतर हुआ? भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम 2023 की धारा 1 बनाम 1872...

Supreme Court Ruling: Advocates’ Services Excluded from Consumer Protection Act – A Landmark Judgment

The Supreme Court of India recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Bar of Indian Lawyers Through Its President Jasbir Singh Malik...

MCQs on Prevention of Curruption Act 1988

Here is the complete Segment 1 (MCQs 1-20) based on The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. MCQs on The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Segment 1:...

MCQs on Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

Enhance your legal preparation with curated MCQs on the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Ideal for law exams, entrance tests, and subject-wise revision.

Case Summary: Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024)

The Supreme Court of India, in Association for Democratic Reforms v. Union of India (2024), declared the Electoral Bond Scheme, 2018, unconstitutional for violating transparency, the right to know under Article 19(1)(a), and the principle of equality under Article 14. The scheme enabled anonymous political donations and removed caps on corporate funding, raising concerns about electoral integrity. The judgment mandates disclosure of political donations, limits corporate influence, and reinforces free and fair elections, thereby strengthening India's democratic processes.

Case Summary: PUCL v. Union of India (1997)

PUCL v. Union of India (1997) is a landmark Supreme Court judgment that reinforced the right to privacy under Article 21 and established strict procedural safeguards for telephone tapping. This detailed case summary covers facts, issues, arguments, judgment, significance, and critical analysis.

MCQs on Information Technology Act 2000

Segment 1: MCQs on the Information Technology Act, 2000 1. What is the main objective of the Information Technology Act, 2000?a) To promote international tradeb)...

Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court

Case Summary: Baradakanta Mishra v. Registrar of Orissa High Court Citation: (1974) 1 SCC 374 Facts of the Case Case Background: Baradakanta Mishra, who served as a...

MCQ on Contempt of Court Act 1971

Short Notes on the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 Key Provisions: Definitions (Section 2): Civil Contempt: Willful disobedience of a court's order or breach of an undertaking...

MCQs on Court Fees Act 1870

Court Fees Act, 1870 - MCQ (Set 1) What is the main purpose of the Court Fees Act, 1870? a) To regulate the functioning of courtsb)...

Latest news

- Advertisement -